[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGHK07CckLqZBKBD-gpu6x1fLDtZ_ea3D+-pQJc-hQUM0DRgJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 16:14:43 +1000
From: Jonathan Maxwell <jmaxwell37@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kuznet <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
yoshfuji <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jon Maxwell <jmaxwell@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] tcp: Add mark for TIMEWAIT sockets
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 05/09/2018 10:21 PM, Jon Maxwell wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> if (th->rst)
>> @@ -723,11 +724,17 @@ static void tcp_v4_send_reset(const struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> arg.tos = ip_hdr(skb)->tos;
>> arg.uid = sock_net_uid(net, sk && sk_fullsock(sk) ? sk : NULL);
>> local_bh_disable();
>> - ip_send_unicast_reply(*this_cpu_ptr(net->ipv4.tcp_sk),
>> + ctl_sk = *this_cpu_ptr(net->ipv4.tcp_sk);
>> + if (sk && sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT)
>> + ctl_sk->sk_mark = inet_twsk(sk)->tw_mark;
>> + else if (sk && sk_fullsock(sk))
>
> I do not believe we could have a non fullsock here ?
>
Okay thanks I'll make these changes to v2.
> A request socket (SYN_RECV state) at this point is not expected.
>
>
> So you can factorize :
>
> if (sk)
> ctl_sk->sk_mark = (sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT) ?
> inet_twsk(sk)->tw_mark : sk->sk_mark;
>
> (same remark for IPv6)
>
>
>> + ctl_sk->sk_mark = sk->sk_mark;
>> + ip_send_unicast_reply(ctl_sk,
>> skb, &TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->header.h4.opt,
>> ip_hdr(skb)->saddr, ip_hdr(skb)->daddr,
>> &arg, arg.iov[0].iov_len);
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists