lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 10 May 2018 12:53:45 +0300
From:   Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
To:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
        shakeelb@...gle.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, hannes@...xchg.org,
        mhocko@...nel.org, ktkhai@...tuozzo.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        pombredanne@...b.com, stummala@...eaurora.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, guro@...com,
        mka@...omium.org, penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp,
        chris@...is-wilson.co.uk, longman@...hat.com, minchan@...nel.org,
        ying.huang@...el.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net, jbacik@...com,
        linux@...ck-us.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, willy@...radead.org, lirongqing@...du.com,
        aryabinin@...tuozzo.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 10/13] mm: Set bit in memcg shrinker bitmap on first
 list_lru item apearance

Introduce set_shrinker_bit() function to set shrinker-related
bit in memcg shrinker bitmap, and set the bit after the first
item is added and in case of reparenting destroyed memcg's items.

This will allow next patch to make shrinkers be called only,
in case of they have charged objects at the moment, and
to improve shrink_slab() performance.

Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
---
 include/linux/memcontrol.h |   15 +++++++++++++++
 mm/list_lru.c              |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index e5e7e0fc7158..82f892e77637 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -1274,6 +1274,21 @@ static inline void memcg_put_cache_ids(void)
 
 extern int memcg_shrinker_nr_max;
 extern int memcg_expand_shrinker_maps(int old_id, int id);
+
+static inline void memcg_set_shrinker_bit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid, int nr)
+{
+	if (nr >= 0 && memcg && memcg != root_mem_cgroup) {
+		struct memcg_shrinker_map *map;
+
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		map = MEMCG_SHRINKER_MAP(memcg, nid);
+		set_bit(nr, map->map);
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+	}
+}
+#else
+static inline void memcg_set_shrinker_bit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+					  int node, int id) { }
 #endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG_SHRINKER */
 
 #endif /* _LINUX_MEMCONTROL_H */
diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c
index 7f6cb27aa2f5..6ce52f80f12c 100644
--- a/mm/list_lru.c
+++ b/mm/list_lru.c
@@ -30,6 +30,11 @@ static void list_lru_unregister(struct list_lru *lru)
 	list_del(&lru->list);
 	mutex_unlock(&list_lrus_mutex);
 }
+
+static int lru_shrinker_id(struct list_lru *lru)
+{
+	return lru->shrinker_id;
+}
 #else
 static void list_lru_register(struct list_lru *lru)
 {
@@ -38,6 +43,11 @@ static void list_lru_register(struct list_lru *lru)
 static void list_lru_unregister(struct list_lru *lru)
 {
 }
+
+static int lru_shrinker_id(struct list_lru *lru)
+{
+	return -1;
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG && !CONFIG_SLOB */
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_MEMCG) && !defined(CONFIG_SLOB)
@@ -121,13 +131,17 @@ bool list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item)
 {
 	int nid = page_to_nid(virt_to_page(item));
 	struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
+	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
 	struct list_lru_one *l;
 
 	spin_lock(&nlru->lock);
 	if (list_empty(item)) {
-		l = list_lru_from_kmem(nlru, item, NULL);
+		l = list_lru_from_kmem(nlru, item, &memcg);
 		list_add_tail(item, &l->list);
-		l->nr_items++;
+		/* Set shrinker bit if the first element was added */
+		if (!l->nr_items++)
+			memcg_set_shrinker_bit(memcg, nid,
+					       lru_shrinker_id(lru));
 		nlru->nr_items++;
 		spin_unlock(&nlru->lock);
 		return true;
@@ -522,6 +536,7 @@ static void memcg_drain_list_lru_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid,
 	struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
 	int dst_idx = dst_memcg->kmemcg_id;
 	struct list_lru_one *src, *dst;
+	bool set;
 
 	/*
 	 * Since list_lru_{add,del} may be called under an IRQ-safe lock,
@@ -533,7 +548,10 @@ static void memcg_drain_list_lru_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid,
 	dst = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(nlru, dst_idx);
 
 	list_splice_init(&src->list, &dst->list);
+	set = (!dst->nr_items && src->nr_items);
 	dst->nr_items += src->nr_items;
+	if (set)
+		memcg_set_shrinker_bit(dst_memcg, nid, lru_shrinker_id(lru));
 	src->nr_items = 0;
 
 	spin_unlock_irq(&nlru->lock);

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ