[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6be7739b-8c6c-bbd8-6866-a26d8d25266d@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 13:29:28 +0300
From: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2]: perf/x86: store user space frame-pointer value on a
sample
Hi,
On 10.05.2018 13:14, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:42:38PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>>> The Changelog needs to state that user_regs->bp is in fact valid and
>>
>> That actually was tested on binaries compiled without and with BP exposed
>> and in the latter case proved the value of that change.
>
> Mostly works is not the same as 'always initialized', if there are entry
> paths that do not store that register, then using the value might leak
> values from the kernel stack, which would be bad.
Yep, absolutely agree. Extra care needs to be taken here.
>
> But like said, I think much of the kernel entry code was sanitized with
> the PTI effort and I suspect things are in fact fine now, but lets wait
> for Andy to confirm.
>
Thanks,
Alexey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists