[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180510111434.GC6977@amd>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 13:14:34 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tty: implement led triggers
Hi!
> > > > @@ -499,6 +500,7 @@ static void flush_to_ldisc(struct work_struct *work)
> > > > struct tty_buffer *head = buf->head;
> > > > struct tty_buffer *next;
> > > > int count;
> > > > + unsigned long delay = 50 /* ms */;
> > >
> > > Comment after the semicolon?
> >
> > Given that this comment is about the 50 and not the delay member, I
> > prefer it before the ;.
>
> Hmm. I personally find it hard to read and can only find about 30
> instances of this comment style (for assignments) in the kernel. And
> arguably the comment applies equally well to the delay variable in this
> case too.
It is not too traditional, but I believe it makes sense....
(and yes, I wish we had kernel in Rust, so we could have real units
attached to our variables...)
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists