linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 09/10] drivers: qcom: rpmh: add support for batch RPMH request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180510151714.GI4698@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Thu, 10 May 2018 09:17:14 -0600
From:   Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc:     andy.gross@...aro.org, david.brown@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        rnayak@...eaurora.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sboyd@...nel.org,
        evgreen@...omium.org, dianders@...omium.org, rplsssn@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 09/10] drivers: qcom: rpmh: add support for batch RPMH
 request

On Wed, May 09 2018 at 16:03 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 11:01:58AM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
>> Platform drivers need make a lot of resource state requests at the same
>> time, say, at the start or end of an usecase. It can be quite
>> inefficient to send each request separately. Instead they can give the
>> RPMH library a batch of requests to be sent and wait on the whole
>> transaction to be complete.
>>
>> rpmh_write_batch() is a blocking call that can be used to send multiple
>> RPMH command sets. Each RPMH command set is set asynchronously and the
>> API blocks until all the command sets are complete and receive their
>> tx_done callbacks.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v7:
>> 	- Check for loop out of bounds
>>
>> Changes in v6:
>> 	- replace rpmh_client with device *
>> Changes in v4:
>> 	- reorganize rpmh_write_batch()
>> 	- introduce wait_count here, instead of patch#4
>> ---
>>  drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  include/soc/qcom/rpmh.h |   8 +++
>>  2 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
>> index 1bb62876795c..a0e277b4b846 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c
>>
>> ...
>>
>> +static int flush_batch(struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr)
>> +{
>> +	const struct rpmh_request *rpm_msg;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	/* Send Sleep/Wake requests to the controller, expect no response */
>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctrlr->lock, flags);
>> +	for (i = 0; ctrlr->batch_cache[i]; i++) {
>
>I missed this earlier: the loop goes beyond ctrlr->batch_cache when
>the batch cache is full.
>
>> +		rpm_msg = ctrlr->batch_cache[i];
>> +		ret = rpmh_rsc_write_ctrl_data(ctrlr->drv, &rpm_msg->msg);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			break;
>> +	}
>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctrlr->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void invalidate_batch(struct rpmh_ctrlr *ctrlr)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +	int index = 0;
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctrlr->lock, flags);
>> +	while (ctrlr->batch_cache[index]) {
>
>This still goes beyond ctrlr->batch_cache when the batch cache is
>full.
I will check through the code for all out-of-bounds. Seems like I have
not worried about it too much. Well the space here assigned is beyond
what we see on a production device. Neverthless, it needs to be checked.

Thanks for your review Matthias.

-- Lina