linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] random: Omit double-printing ratelimit messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 May 2018 15:40:41 -0400
From:   "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 0x7f454c46@...il.com,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] random: Omit double-printing ratelimit messages

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 07:37:40PM +0100, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> 
> Ok, then what's the purpose of those messages?
> :        pr_notice("random: %d get_random_xx warning(s) missed "
> :                  "due to ratelimiting\n",
> :                  unseeded_warning.missed);
> :        pr_notice("random: %d urandom warning(s) missed "
> :                  "due to ratelimiting\n",
> :                  urandom_warning.missed);
> 
> I thought you want to print the summary after initializing random,
> not once per second?

Yes, and that's what is happening today.  The "output lines suppressed
due to ratelimiting" message is only printed out by printk_ratelimit()
function, which we are *not* using.

So I'm not sure what you are unhappy about?  What are you trying to fix?

>From my testing, it is *NOT* double-printing ratelimit messages today.
Are you seeing something that I am not?

       	   	     	     	     	     	  - Ted