linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] coredump: rename umh_pipe_setup() to coredump_pipe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180510231907.xbok4h6rjopwdq6e@ast-mbp>
Date:   Thu, 10 May 2018 16:19:09 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc:     viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, ast@...nel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coredump: rename umh_pipe_setup() to
 coredump_pipe_setup()

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:30:02PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> This makes it clearer this code is part of the coredump code, and
> is not an exported generic helper from kernel/umh.c.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...nel.org>
> ---
>  fs/coredump.c | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/coredump.c b/fs/coredump.c
> index 1e2c87acac9b..566504781683 100644
> --- a/fs/coredump.c
> +++ b/fs/coredump.c
> @@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ static void wait_for_dump_helpers(struct file *file)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * umh_pipe_setup
> + * coredump_pipe_setup
>   * helper function to customize the process used
>   * to collect the core in userspace.  Specifically
>   * it sets up a pipe and installs it as fd 0 (stdin)
> @@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ static void wait_for_dump_helpers(struct file *file)
>   * is a special value that we use to trap recursive
>   * core dumps
>   */
> -static int umh_pipe_setup(struct subprocess_info *info, struct cred *new)
> +static int coredump_pipe_setup(struct subprocess_info *info, struct cred *new)

I think this renaming makes sense.
How do we want to proceed?
I can take it as part of my series and get the whole thing through net-next
or folks want to apply this separately?