[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGHK07DGn50gO9GmZo3BqMg8K8iEawERx2J1RFs1E_CRiMw3fQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 14:23:42 +1000
From: Jonathan Maxwell <jmaxwell37@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, kuznet <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
yoshfuji <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jon Maxwell <jmaxwell@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: Add mark for TIMEWAIT sockets
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 05/09/2018 07:07 PM, Jon Maxwell wrote:
>> Aidan McGurn from Openwave Mobility systems reported the following bug:
>>
>> "Marked routing is broken on customer deployment. Its effects are large
>> increase in Uplink retransmissions caused by the client never receiving
>> the final ACK to their FINACK - this ACK misses the mark and routes out
>> of the incorrect route."
>>
>> Currently marks are added to sk_buffs for replies when the "fwmark_reflect"
>> sysctl is enabled. But not for TIME_WAIT sockets where the original socket had
>> sk->sk_mark set via setsockopt(SO_MARK..).
>>
>> Fix this in IPv4/v6 by adding tw->tw_mark for TIME_WAIT sockets. Copy the the
>> original sk->sk_mark in __inet_twsk_hashdance() to the new tw->tw_mark location.
>> Then copy this into ctl_sk->sk_mark so that the skb gets sent with the correct
>> mark. Do the same for resets. Give the "fwmark_reflect" sysctl precedence over
>> sk->sk_mark so that netfilter rules are still honored.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jon Maxwell <jmaxwell37@...il.com>
>> ---
>> include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h | 1 +
>> net/ipv4/ip_output.c | 3 ++-
>> net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>> net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c | 1 +
>> net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 8 +++++++-
>> 5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h b/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h
>> index c7be1ca8e562..659d8ed5a3bc 100644
>> --- a/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h
>> +++ b/include/net/inet_timewait_sock.h
>> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct inet_timewait_sock {
>> #define tw_dr __tw_common.skc_tw_dr
>>
>> int tw_timeout;
>> + __u32 tw_mark;
>> volatile unsigned char tw_substate;
>> unsigned char tw_rcv_wscale;
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
>> index 95adb171f852..cca4412dc4cb 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
>> @@ -1539,6 +1539,7 @@ void ip_send_unicast_reply(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> struct sk_buff *nskb;
>> int err;
>> int oif;
>> + __u32 mark = IP4_REPLY_MARK(net, skb->mark);
>>
>> if (__ip_options_echo(net, &replyopts.opt.opt, skb, sopt))
>> return;
>> @@ -1561,7 +1562,7 @@ void ip_send_unicast_reply(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> oif = skb->skb_iif;
>>
>> flowi4_init_output(&fl4, oif,
>> - IP4_REPLY_MARK(net, skb->mark),
>> + mark ? (mark) : sk->sk_mark,
>
> You can avoid the declaration of mark variable and simply use here :
>
> IP4_REPLY_MARK(net, skb->mark) ?: sk->sk_mark,
>
Thanks for the advice and suggestions Eric. That is more elegant. Will do in v1.
>> RT_TOS(arg->tos),
>> RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE, ip_hdr(skb)->protocol,
>> ip_reply_arg_flowi_flags(arg),
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
>> index f70586b50838..fbee36579c83 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
>> @@ -621,6 +621,7 @@ static void tcp_v4_send_reset(const struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> struct sock *sk1 = NULL;
>> #endif
>> struct net *net;
>> + struct sock *ctl_sk;
>>
>> /* Never send a reset in response to a reset. */
>> if (th->rst)
>> @@ -723,11 +724,17 @@ static void tcp_v4_send_reset(const struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> arg.tos = ip_hdr(skb)->tos;
>> arg.uid = sock_net_uid(net, sk && sk_fullsock(sk) ? sk : NULL);
>> local_bh_disable();
>> - ip_send_unicast_reply(*this_cpu_ptr(net->ipv4.tcp_sk),
>> + ctl_sk = *this_cpu_ptr(net->ipv4.tcp_sk);
>> + if (sk && sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT)
>> + ctl_sk->sk_mark = inet_twsk(sk)->tw_mark;
>> + else if (sk && sk_fullsock(sk))
>> + ctl_sk->sk_mark = sk->sk_mark;
>> + ip_send_unicast_reply(ctl_sk,
>> skb, &TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->header.h4.opt,
>> ip_hdr(skb)->saddr, ip_hdr(skb)->daddr,
>> &arg, arg.iov[0].iov_len);
>>
>> + ctl_sk->sk_mark = 0;
>> __TCP_INC_STATS(net, TCP_MIB_OUTSEGS);
>> __TCP_INC_STATS(net, TCP_MIB_OUTRSTS);
>> local_bh_enable();
>> @@ -759,6 +766,7 @@ static void tcp_v4_send_ack(const struct sock *sk,
>> } rep;
>> struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
>> struct ip_reply_arg arg;
>> + struct sock *ctl_sk;
>>
>> memset(&rep.th, 0, sizeof(struct tcphdr));
>> memset(&arg, 0, sizeof(arg));
>> @@ -809,11 +817,17 @@ static void tcp_v4_send_ack(const struct sock *sk,
>> arg.tos = tos;
>> arg.uid = sock_net_uid(net, sk_fullsock(sk) ? sk : NULL);
>> local_bh_disable();
>> - ip_send_unicast_reply(*this_cpu_ptr(net->ipv4.tcp_sk),
>> + ctl_sk = *this_cpu_ptr(net->ipv4.tcp_sk);
>> + if (sk && sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT)
>> + ctl_sk->sk_mark = inet_twsk(sk)->tw_mark;
>> + else if (sk && sk_fullsock(sk))
>> + ctl_sk->sk_mark = sk->sk_mark;
>> + ip_send_unicast_reply(ctl_sk,
>> skb, &TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->header.h4.opt,
>> ip_hdr(skb)->saddr, ip_hdr(skb)->daddr,
>> &arg, arg.iov[0].iov_len);
>>
>> + ctl_sk->sk_mark = 0;
>> __TCP_INC_STATS(net, TCP_MIB_OUTSEGS);
>> local_bh_enable();
>> }
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
>> index 57b5468b5139..f867658b4b30 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
>> @@ -263,6 +263,7 @@ void tcp_time_wait(struct sock *sk, int state, int timeo)
>> struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
>>
>> tw->tw_transparent = inet->transparent;
>> + tw->tw_mark = sk->sk_mark;
>> tw->tw_rcv_wscale = tp->rx_opt.rcv_wscale;
>> tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt = tp->rcv_nxt;
>> tcptw->tw_snd_nxt = tp->snd_nxt;
>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
>> index 6d664d83cd16..a6f876125091 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
>> @@ -803,6 +803,7 @@ static void tcp_v6_send_response(const struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, u32
>> unsigned int tot_len = sizeof(struct tcphdr);
>> struct dst_entry *dst;
>> __be32 *topt;
>> + __u32 mark = IP6_REPLY_MARK(net, skb->mark);
>>
>> if (tsecr)
>> tot_len += TCPOLEN_TSTAMP_ALIGNED;
>> @@ -871,11 +872,16 @@ static void tcp_v6_send_response(const struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, u32
>> fl6.flowi6_oif = oif;
>> }
>>
>> - fl6.flowi6_mark = IP6_REPLY_MARK(net, skb->mark);
>> + if (sk && sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT)
>> + ctl_sk->sk_mark = inet_twsk(sk)->tw_mark;
>> + else if (sk && sk_fullsock(sk))
>> + ctl_sk->sk_mark = sk->sk_mark;
>
> Unfortunately IPv6 has a single net->ipv6.tcp_sk, shared by all cpus.
>
> So writing ctl_sk->sk_mark is racy on SMP hosts.
>
> I would suggest using a local variable, and not touch ctl_sk->sk_mark
>
Sure I'll use a local variable for that in IPv6 instead and post in v1 as well.
> For consistency, you could do the same for IPv4, even if IPv4 currently uses per-cpu sockets
>
If it's okay I'll stick to ctl_sk->sk_mark for IPv4 as its pulled out
of the ctl_sk again in
ip_send_unicast_reply() and that will avoid having to add another argument.
Regards
Jon
>
>> + fl6.flowi6_mark = mark ? (mark) : ctl_sk->sk_mark;
>> fl6.fl6_dport = t1->dest;
>> fl6.fl6_sport = t1->source;
>> fl6.flowi6_uid = sock_net_uid(net, sk && sk_fullsock(sk) ? sk : NULL);
>> security_skb_classify_flow(skb, flowi6_to_flowi(&fl6));
>> + ctl_sk->sk_mark = 0;
>>
>> /* Pass a socket to ip6_dst_lookup either it is for RST
>> * Underlying function will use this to retrieve the network
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists