linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V8 1/5] crypto: Multi-buffer encryption infrastructure support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180511044530.n6ht3mpvg22hqny5@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:   Fri, 11 May 2018 12:45:30 +0800
From:   Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:     "Dey, Megha" <megha.dey@...el.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 1/5] crypto: Multi-buffer encryption infrastructure
 support

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 01:24:42AM +0000, Dey, Megha wrote:
> 
> Are you suggesting that the SIMD wrapper, will do what is currently being done by the ' mcryptd_queue_worker ' function (assuming FPU is not disabled) i.e dispatching the job to the inner algorithm?
> 
> I have got rid of the mcryptd layer( have an inner layer, outer SIMD layer, handled the pointers and completions accordingly), but still facing some issues after removing the per cpu mcryptd_cpu_queue.

Why don't you post what you've got and we can work it out together?

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt