linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/platform/UV: Use new set memory block size function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180511052440.GD2902@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 May 2018 07:24:40 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     mike.travis@....com
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@....com>,
        Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@....com>,
        Andrew Banman <andrew.banman@....com>, jgross@...e.com,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, mhocko@...e.com,
        kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/platform/UV: Use new set memory block size
 function

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 06:18:34PM -0500, mike.travis@....com wrote:
> Add a call to the new function to "adjust" the current fixed UV memory
> block size of 2GB so it can be changed to a different physical boundary.
> This accommodates changes in the Intel BIOS, and therefore UV BIOS, which
> now can align boundaries different than the previous UV standard of 2GB.
> It also flags any UV Mem boundaries that cause a change in the mem block
> size boundary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <mike.travis@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Banman <andrew.banman@....com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c |   49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 

<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read:
    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>