| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <02a401d3e90f$cdb0be90$69123bb0$@d-silva.org>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 20:06:54 +1000
From: "Alastair D'Silva" <alastair@...ilva.org>
To: "'Frederic Barrat'" <fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com>,
"'Alastair D'Silva'" <alastair@....ibm.com>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<mikey@...ling.org>, <vaibhav@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <malat@...ian.org>,
<felix@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <pombredanne@...b.com>,
<sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <npiggin@...il.com>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>, <fbarrat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<corbet@....net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 5/7] ocxl: Expose the thread_id needed for wait on POWER9
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com>
> Sent: Friday, 11 May 2018 7:25 PM
> To: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@....ibm.com>; linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-doc@...r.kernel.org;
> mikey@...ling.org; vaibhav@...ux.vnet.ibm.com;
> aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com; malat@...ian.org;
> felix@...ux.vnet.ibm.com; pombredanne@...b.com;
> sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com; npiggin@...il.com;
> gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; arnd@...db.de;
> andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com; fbarrat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com;
> corbet@....net; Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] ocxl: Expose the thread_id needed for wait on
> POWER9
>
>
>
> Le 11/05/2018 à 08:13, Alastair D'Silva a écrit :
> > From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>
> >
> > In order to successfully issue as_notify, an AFU needs to know the TID
> > to notify, which in turn means that this information should be
> > available in userspace so it can be communicated to the AFU.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>
> > ---
>
> Ok, so we keep the limitation of having only one thread per context able to
> call 'wait', even though we don't have to worry about depleting the pool of
> TIDs any more. I think that's acceptable, though we don't really have a reason
> to justify it any more. Any reason you want to keep it that way?
>
No strong reason, just trying to minimise the amount of changes. We can always expand the scope later, if we have a use-case for it.
> Fred
>
>
> > drivers/misc/ocxl/context.c | 5 ++-
> > drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h | 1 +
> > include/misc/ocxl.h | 9 ++++++
> > include/uapi/misc/ocxl.h | 8 +++++
> > 6 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/context.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/context.c
> > index 909e8807824a..95f74623113e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/context.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/context.c
> > @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ int ocxl_context_init(struct ocxl_context *ctx, struct
> ocxl_afu *afu,
> > mutex_init(&ctx->xsl_error_lock);
> > mutex_init(&ctx->irq_lock);
> > idr_init(&ctx->irq_idr);
> > + ctx->tidr = 0;
> > +
> > /*
> > * Keep a reference on the AFU to make sure it's valid for the
> > * duration of the life of the context @@ -65,6 +67,7 @@ int
> > ocxl_context_attach(struct ocxl_context *ctx, u64 amr)
> > {
> > int rc;
> >
> > + // Locks both status & tidr
> > mutex_lock(&ctx->status_mutex);
> > if (ctx->status != OPENED) {
> > rc = -EIO;
> > @@ -72,7 +75,7 @@ int ocxl_context_attach(struct ocxl_context *ctx, u64
> amr)
> > }
> >
> > rc = ocxl_link_add_pe(ctx->afu->fn->link, ctx->pasid,
> > - current->mm->context.id, 0, amr, current->mm,
> > + current->mm->context.id, ctx->tidr, amr, current-
> >mm,
> > xsl_fault_error, ctx);
> > if (rc)
> > goto out;
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c index
> > 038509e5d031..eb409a469f21 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c
> > @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
> > #include <linux/sched/signal.h>
> > #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> > #include <uapi/misc/ocxl.h>
> > +#include <asm/reg.h>
> > +#include <asm/switch_to.h>
> > #include "ocxl_internal.h"
> >
> >
> > @@ -123,11 +125,55 @@ static long afu_ioctl_get_metadata(struct
> ocxl_context *ctx,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> > +static long afu_ioctl_enable_p9_wait(struct ocxl_context *ctx,
> > + struct ocxl_ioctl_p9_wait __user *uarg) {
> > + struct ocxl_ioctl_p9_wait arg;
> > +
> > + memset(&arg, 0, sizeof(arg));
> > +
> > + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P9_TIDR)) {
> > + enum ocxl_context_status status;
> > +
> > + // Locks both status & tidr
> > + mutex_lock(&ctx->status_mutex);
> > + if (!ctx->tidr) {
> > + if (set_thread_tidr(current))
> > + return -ENOENT;
> > +
> > + ctx->tidr = current->thread.tidr;
> > + }
> > +
> > + status = ctx->status;
> > + mutex_unlock(&ctx->status_mutex);
> > +
> > + if (status == ATTACHED) {
> > + int rc;
> > + struct link *link = ctx->afu->fn->link;
> > +
> > + rc = ocxl_link_update_pe(link, ctx->pasid, ctx->tidr);
> > + if (rc)
> > + return rc;
> > + }
> > +
> > + arg.thread_id = ctx->tidr;
> > + } else
> > + return -ENOENT;
> > +
> > + if (copy_to_user(uarg, &arg, sizeof(arg)))
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> > #define CMD_STR(x) (x == OCXL_IOCTL_ATTACH ? "ATTACH" :
> \
> > x == OCXL_IOCTL_IRQ_ALLOC ? "IRQ_ALLOC" : \
> > x == OCXL_IOCTL_IRQ_FREE ? "IRQ_FREE" :
> \
> > x == OCXL_IOCTL_IRQ_SET_FD ? "IRQ_SET_FD" :
> \
> > x == OCXL_IOCTL_GET_METADATA ?
> "GET_METADATA" : \
> > + x == OCXL_IOCTL_ENABLE_P9_WAIT ?
> "ENABLE_P9_WAIT" : \
> > "UNKNOWN")
> >
> > static long afu_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, @@ -186,6
> > +232,13 @@ static long afu_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> > (struct ocxl_ioctl_metadata __user *) args);
> > break;
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> > + case OCXL_IOCTL_ENABLE_P9_WAIT:
> > + rc = afu_ioctl_enable_p9_wait(ctx,
> > + (struct ocxl_ioctl_p9_wait __user *) args);
> > + break;
> > +#endif
> > +
> > default:
> > rc = -EINVAL;
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c index
> > 656e8610eec2..88876ae8f330 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c
> > @@ -544,6 +544,42 @@ int ocxl_link_add_pe(void *link_handle, int pasid,
> u32 pidr, u32 tidr,
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ocxl_link_add_pe);
> >
> > +int ocxl_link_update_pe(void *link_handle, int pasid, __u16 tid) {
> > + struct link *link = (struct link *) link_handle;
> > + struct spa *spa = link->spa;
> > + struct ocxl_process_element *pe;
> > + int pe_handle, rc;
> > +
> > + if (pasid > SPA_PASID_MAX)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + pe_handle = pasid & SPA_PE_MASK;
> > + pe = spa->spa_mem + pe_handle;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&spa->spa_lock);
> > +
> > + pe->tid = tid;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The barrier makes sure the PE is updated
> > + * before we clear the NPU context cache below, so that the
> > + * old PE cannot be reloaded erroneously.
> > + */
> > + mb();
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * hook to platform code
> > + * On powerpc, the entry needs to be cleared from the context
> > + * cache of the NPU.
> > + */
> > + rc = pnv_ocxl_spa_remove_pe_from_cache(link->platform_data,
> pe_handle);
> > + WARN_ON(rc);
> > +
> > + mutex_unlock(&spa->spa_lock);
> > + return rc;
> > +}
> > +
> > int ocxl_link_remove_pe(void *link_handle, int pasid)
> > {
> > struct link *link = (struct link *) link_handle; diff --git
> > a/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h
> > b/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h
> > index 5d421824afd9..a32f2151029f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/ocxl_internal.h
> > @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ struct ocxl_context {
> > struct ocxl_xsl_error xsl_error;
> > struct mutex irq_lock;
> > struct idr irq_idr;
> > + u16 tidr; // Thread ID used for P9 wait implementation
> > };
> >
> > struct ocxl_process_element {
> > diff --git a/include/misc/ocxl.h b/include/misc/ocxl.h index
> > 51ccf76db293..9ff6ddc28e22 100644
> > --- a/include/misc/ocxl.h
> > +++ b/include/misc/ocxl.h
> > @@ -188,6 +188,15 @@ extern int ocxl_link_add_pe(void *link_handle, int
> pasid, u32 pidr, u32 tidr,
> > void (*xsl_err_cb)(void *data, u64 addr, u64 dsisr),
> > void *xsl_err_data);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * Update values within a Process Element
> > + *
> > + * link_handle: the link handle associated with the process element
> > + * pasid: the PASID for the AFU context
> > + * tid: the new thread id for the process element */ extern int
> > +ocxl_link_update_pe(void *link_handle, int pasid, __u16 tid);
> > +
> > /*
> > * Remove a Process Element from the Shared Process Area for a link
> > */
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/misc/ocxl.h b/include/uapi/misc/ocxl.h index
> > 0af83d80fb3e..561e6f0dfcb7 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/misc/ocxl.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/misc/ocxl.h
> > @@ -48,6 +48,13 @@ struct ocxl_ioctl_metadata {
> > __u64 reserved[13]; // Total of 16*u64
> > };
> >
> > +struct ocxl_ioctl_p9_wait {
> > + __u16 thread_id; // The thread ID required to wake this thread
> > + __u16 reserved1;
> > + __u32 reserved2;
> > + __u64 reserved3[3];
> > +};
> > +
> > struct ocxl_ioctl_irq_fd {
> > __u64 irq_offset;
> > __s32 eventfd;
> > @@ -62,5 +69,6 @@ struct ocxl_ioctl_irq_fd {
> > #define OCXL_IOCTL_IRQ_FREE _IOW(OCXL_MAGIC, 0x12, __u64)
> > #define OCXL_IOCTL_IRQ_SET_FD _IOW(OCXL_MAGIC, 0x13, struct
> ocxl_ioctl_irq_fd)
> > #define OCXL_IOCTL_GET_METADATA _IOR(OCXL_MAGIC, 0x14, struct
> > ocxl_ioctl_metadata)
> > +#define OCXL_IOCTL_ENABLE_P9_WAIT _IOR(OCXL_MAGIC, 0x15,
> struct ocxl_ioctl_p9_wait)
> >
> > #endif /* _UAPI_MISC_OCXL_H */
> >
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
> http://www.avg.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists