[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180511115306.GC30118@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 17:23:06 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Eric Long <eric.long@...eadtrum.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dmaengine: sprd: Add Spreadtrum DMA configuration
On 11-05-18, 19:44, Baolin Wang wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
>
> On 11 May 2018 at 19:22, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On 09-05-18, 19:12, Baolin Wang wrote:
> >
> >> +/*
> >> + * struct sprd_dma_config - DMA configuration structure
> >> + * @cfg: dma slave channel runtime config
> >> + * @src_addr: the source physical address
> >> + * @dst_addr: the destination physical address
> >> + * @block_len: specify one block transfer length
> >> + * @transcation_len: specify one transcation transfer length
> >> + * @src_step: source transfer step
> >> + * @dst_step: destination transfer step
> >> + * @wrap_ptr: wrap pointer address, once the transfer address reaches the
> >> + * 'wrap_ptr', the next transfer address will jump to the 'wrap_to' address.
> >> + * @wrap_to: wrap jump to address
> >> + * @req_mode: specify the DMA request mode
> >> + * @int_mode: specify the DMA interrupt type
> >> + */
> >> +struct sprd_dma_config {
> >> + struct dma_slave_config cfg;
> >> + phys_addr_t src_addr;
> >> + phys_addr_t dst_addr;
> >
> > these are already in cfg so why duplicate, same for few more here.
>
> We save them in 'struct sprd_dma_config' as one parameter for
> sprd_dma_config(), otherwise we need add 2 more parameters (src and
> dst) for sprd_dma_config().
I am not sure I follow...
I meant you can use sprd_dma_config.cfg->src_addr/dst_addr and remove src_addr &
dst_addr in the sprd_dma_config. It duplicate..
Same for few more params...
> >> + if (!is_slave_direction(dir) || sglen > 1)
> >> + return NULL;
> >> +
> >> + sdesc = kzalloc(sizeof(*sdesc), GFP_NOWAIT);
> >> + if (!sdesc)
> >> + return NULL;
> >> +
> >> + for_each_sg(sgl, sg, sglen, i) {
> >> + if (dir == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) {
> >> + slave_cfg->src_addr = sg_dma_address(sg);
> >> + slave_cfg->dst_addr = slave_cfg->cfg.dst_addr;
> >> + slave_cfg->src_step =
> >> + sprd_dma_get_step(slave_cfg->cfg.src_addr_width);
> >> + slave_cfg->dst_step = SPRD_DMA_NONE_STEP;
> >> + } else {
> >> + slave_cfg->src_addr = slave_cfg->cfg.src_addr;
> >> + slave_cfg->dst_addr = sg_dma_address(sg);
> >> + slave_cfg->src_step = SPRD_DMA_NONE_STEP;
> >> + slave_cfg->dst_step =
> >> + sprd_dma_get_step(slave_cfg->cfg.dst_addr_width);
> >
> > use a helper for filling this and passing right values for each case?
>
> We need pass many values to this helper, but will try. Thanks.
I think 5 and that may help to look it better :)
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists