[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180511153947.GC12705@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 17:39:47 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>
Cc: alex_gagniuc@...lteam.com, austin_bolen@...l.com,
shyam_iyer@...l.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@...el.com>,
Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>,
"Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" <zjzhang@...eaurora.org>,
Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@...wei.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, devel@...ica.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/3] acpi: apei: Rename ghes_severity() to
ghes_cper_severity()
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 04:33:51PM -0500, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> ghes_severity() is a misnomer in this case, as it implies the severity
> of the entire GHES structure. Instead, it maps one CPER value to a
> monotonically increasing number.
... as opposed to CPER severity which is something else or what is this
formulation trying to express?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists