linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] acpi: apei: Do not panic() on PCIe errors reported through GHES

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45b7be09-c9b3-8006-6ea0-36b4ff38607c@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 May 2018 11:12:25 -0500
From:   "Alex G." <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     alex_gagniuc@...lteam.com, austin_bolen@...l.com,
        shyam_iyer@...l.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@...el.com>,
        Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>,
        "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" <zjzhang@...eaurora.org>,
        Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@...wei.com>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, devel@...ica.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] acpi: apei: Do not panic() on PCIe errors
 reported through GHES



On 05/11/2018 11:02 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:54:09AM -0500, Alex G. wrote:
>> That being clarified, should I replace "crackmonkey" with "broken" in
>> the commit message?
> 
> Keep your opinion *outside* of commit messages - their goal is to
> explain *why* the change is being made in strictly technical language so
> that when someone looks at git history, someone can know *why*.
> 
>> Borislav, I sense some confusion. AER is not a "reporting" driver. It
>> handles the errors. You can't leave these errors unhandled. They
>> propagate to the root complex and can cause fatal MCEs when not handled.
>> The window to handle the error is pretty large, so it's not a concern
>> when you're handling it.
> 
> I think *you* didn't get it: IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER) is not
> enough of a check to confirm that there actually *is* an AER driver to
> handle the errors. If you really want to make sure the driver is loaded
> and functioning, then you need an explicit registering mechanism or some
> other way of checking it really is there and handling errors.

config ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER
	bool "APEI PCIe AER logging/recovering support"
	depends on ACPI_APEI && PCIEAER
	help
	  PCIe AER errors may be reported via APEI firmware first mode.
	  Turn on this option to enable the corresponding support.

PCIAER is not modularizable. QED

Alex