linux-kernel - Re: Another NVMe failure, this time with AER info

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180511174241.GC7344@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Fri, 11 May 2018 11:42:42 -0600
From:   Keith Busch <keith.busch@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jesse Vincent <jesse@...k.com>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lutomirski <amluto@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: Another NVMe failure, this time with AER info

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:26:11AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> I trust you know the offsets here, but it's hard to tell what this
> is doing with hard-coded addresses. Just to be safe and for clarity,
> I recommend the 'CAP_*+<offset>' with a mask.
> 
> For example, disabling ASPM L1.2 can look like:
> 
>  # setpci -s <B:D.f> CAP_PM+8.l=0:4

My mistake above: CAP_PM is a different capability, not the intended
one. It looks like setpci doesn't even have a convenient symbol for the
L1 PM extended capability, so the hard-coded offsets are the only way
for this setting. Sorry about the mistake.