linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/cgroup: memory controller self-tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1b9740f8-953a-985d-ba21-551e6064a572@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 11 May 2018 14:22:05 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:     Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, kernel-team@...com,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/cgroup: memory controller self-tests

On 05/11/2018 02:02 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 01:33:26PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> Yeah. I see that. You have a switch for the KSFT_ values. Since there is no
>> dependency on the cgroup tree, I would recommend having this patch go through
>> kselftest tree which is the normal process for tests anyway.
>>
>> This version is good and I can apply this to linux-kselftest next. I ran a
>> quick test and the Skip case looks good.
>>
>> TAP version 13
>> selftests: cgroup: test_memcontrol
>> ========================================
>> 1..0 # Skipped: memory controller isn't available
>> not ok 1..1 selftests: cgroup: test_memcontrol [SKIP]
>>
>>
>> Tejun! Please send me your Ack.
> 
> Sure, please feel free to add my ack.  I'll revert the original patch
> from cgroup tree.
> 
> Thanks.
> 

Thanks. I will apply this to linux-kselftest next for 4.18-rc1 with
you Ack.

thanks,
-- Shuah