[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180512142451.GB24215@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 07:24:51 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mhocko@...e.com, hughd@...gle.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, mike.kravetz@...cle.com,
n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: Change return type to vm_fault_t
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:20:29PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> It'd be nicer to realign the 2nd and 3rd arguments
> on the subsequent lines.
>
> vm_fault_t (*fault)(const struct vm_special_mapping *sm,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> struct vm_fault *vmf);
>
It'd be nicer if people didn't try to line up arguments at all and
just indented by an extra two tabs when they had to break a logical
line due to the 80-column limit.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists