[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180512143809.7c6a06ab@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 14:38:09 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: "w@....eu" <w@....eu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org"
<ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] bug-introducing patches
Hi all,
On Wed, 9 May 2018 20:47:27 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 May 2018 18:03:46 +0900 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:47:57AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > > I think this is an excellent idea, copying in Stephen for his input.
> > > > I'm currently on holiday but unless someone convinces me it's a terrible
> > > > idea I'm willing to at least give it a go on a trial basis once I'm back
> > > > home.
> >
> > > Since Stephen merges all -fixes branches first, before merging all the
> > > -next branches, he already generates that as part of linux-next. All
> > > he'd need to do is push that intermediate state out to some
> > > linux-fixes branch for consumption by test bots.
>
> Good idea ... I will see what I can do.
See my announcement of a pending-fixes branch in linux-next (on LKML
and others)
> I currently have 44 such fixes branches. More welcome!
We are up to 55.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists