linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] Revert "ssb: Prevent build of PCI host features in module"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180512121458.58570198@wiggum>
Date:   Sat, 12 May 2018 12:14:58 +0200
From:   Michael Büsch <m@...s.ch>
To:     Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
        Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
        Matt Redfearn <matt.redfearn@...s.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] Revert "ssb: Prevent build of PCI host features
 in module"

On Sat, 12 May 2018 12:00:07 +0200
Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl> wrote:

> > Yes, I'm OK with the patch, if we have a third patch that cleans up the
> > PCI_DRIVERS_LEGACY dependency by moving it to SSB_PCICORE_HOSTMODE
> > where it belongs. (This doesn't need to go into the stable tree.)
> > We currently implicitly get that via dependency chain, so this is OK
> > for now as-is.  
> 
> I'm planning to handle PCI_DRIVERS_LEGACY cleanup once my patches hit
> net-next.git and then wireless-drivers-next.git. It's to avoid
> conflicts.

Yes, thanks. Take your time. We're not in a hurry. :)
This change should not make a functional difference.

-- 
Michael

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped