linux-kernel - [tip:irq/core] genirq/msi: Allow level-triggered MSIs to be exposed by MSI providers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-0be8153cbc2af9a96e9ab8631fc3ba23bb52dbe3@git.kernel.org>
Date:   Sun, 13 May 2018 07:03:47 -0700
From:   tip-bot for Marc Zyngier <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     marc.zyngier@....com, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, hpa@...or.com,
        ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
        robh@...nel.org, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        jason@...edaemon.net, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:irq/core] genirq/msi: Allow level-triggered MSIs to be exposed
 by MSI providers

Commit-ID:  0be8153cbc2af9a96e9ab8631fc3ba23bb52dbe3
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/0be8153cbc2af9a96e9ab8631fc3ba23bb52dbe3
Author:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 8 May 2018 13:14:30 +0100
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Sun, 13 May 2018 15:58:59 +0200

genirq/msi: Allow level-triggered MSIs to be exposed by MSI providers

So far, MSIs have been used to signal edge-triggered interrupts, as
a write is a good model for an edge (you can't "unwrite" something).
On the other hand, routing zillions of wires in an SoC because you
need level interrupts is a bit extreme.

People have come up with a variety of schemes to support this, which
involves sending two messages: one to signal the interrupt, and one
to clear it. Since the kernel cannot represent this, we've ended up
with side-band mechanisms that are pretty awful.

Instead, let's acknoledge the requirement, and ensure that, under the
right circumstances, the irq_compose_msg and irq_write_msg can take
as a parameter an array of two messages instead of a pointer to a
single one. We also add some checking that the compose method only
clobbers the second message if the MSI domain has been created with
the MSI_FLAG_LEVEL_CAPABLE flags.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180508121438.11301-2-marc.zyngier@arm.com

---
 include/linux/msi.h |  2 ++
 kernel/irq/msi.c    | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/msi.h b/include/linux/msi.h
index 1f1bbb5b4679..5839d8062dfc 100644
--- a/include/linux/msi.h
+++ b/include/linux/msi.h
@@ -289,6 +289,8 @@ enum {
 	 * MSI_FLAG_ACTIVATE_EARLY has been set.
 	 */
 	MSI_FLAG_MUST_REACTIVATE	= (1 << 5),
+	/* Is level-triggered capable, using two messages */
+	MSI_FLAG_LEVEL_CAPABLE		= (1 << 6),
 };
 
 int msi_domain_set_affinity(struct irq_data *data, const struct cpumask *mask,
diff --git a/kernel/irq/msi.c b/kernel/irq/msi.c
index 2a8571f72b17..4ca2fd46645d 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/msi.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/msi.c
@@ -76,6 +76,19 @@ static inline void irq_chip_write_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data,
 	data->chip->irq_write_msi_msg(data, msg);
 }
 
+static void msi_check_level(struct irq_domain *domain, struct msi_msg *msg)
+{
+	struct msi_domain_info *info = domain->host_data;
+
+	/*
+	 * If the MSI provider has messed with the second message and
+	 * not advertized that it is level-capable, signal the breakage.
+	 */
+	WARN_ON(!((info->flags & MSI_FLAG_LEVEL_CAPABLE) &&
+		  (info->chip->flags & IRQCHIP_SUPPORTS_LEVEL_MSI)) &&
+		(msg[1].address_lo || msg[1].address_hi || msg[1].data));
+}
+
 /**
  * msi_domain_set_affinity - Generic affinity setter function for MSI domains
  * @irq_data:	The irq data associated to the interrupt
@@ -89,13 +102,14 @@ int msi_domain_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data,
 			    const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
 {
 	struct irq_data *parent = irq_data->parent_data;
-	struct msi_msg msg;
+	struct msi_msg msg[2] = { [1] = { }, };
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = parent->chip->irq_set_affinity(parent, mask, force);
 	if (ret >= 0 && ret != IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE) {
-		BUG_ON(irq_chip_compose_msi_msg(irq_data, &msg));
-		irq_chip_write_msi_msg(irq_data, &msg);
+		BUG_ON(irq_chip_compose_msi_msg(irq_data, msg));
+		msi_check_level(irq_data->domain, msg);
+		irq_chip_write_msi_msg(irq_data, msg);
 	}
 
 	return ret;
@@ -104,20 +118,21 @@ int msi_domain_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data,
 static int msi_domain_activate(struct irq_domain *domain,
 			       struct irq_data *irq_data, bool early)
 {
-	struct msi_msg msg;
+	struct msi_msg msg[2] = { [1] = { }, };
 
-	BUG_ON(irq_chip_compose_msi_msg(irq_data, &msg));
-	irq_chip_write_msi_msg(irq_data, &msg);
+	BUG_ON(irq_chip_compose_msi_msg(irq_data, msg));
+	msi_check_level(irq_data->domain, msg);
+	irq_chip_write_msi_msg(irq_data, msg);
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static void msi_domain_deactivate(struct irq_domain *domain,
 				  struct irq_data *irq_data)
 {
-	struct msi_msg msg;
+	struct msi_msg msg[2];
 
-	memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
-	irq_chip_write_msi_msg(irq_data, &msg);
+	memset(msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
+	irq_chip_write_msi_msg(irq_data, msg);
 }
 
 static int msi_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,