lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1805132007200.1582@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Sun, 13 May 2018 20:09:34 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
cc:     "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/io: Define readq()/writeq() to use 64-bit type

On Thu, 3 May 2018, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>  
> -build_mmio_read(readq, "q", unsigned long, "=r", :"memory")
> -build_mmio_read(__readq, "q", unsigned long, "=r", )
> -build_mmio_write(writeq, "q", unsigned long, "r", :"memory")
> -build_mmio_write(__writeq, "q", unsigned long, "r", )
> +build_mmio_read(readq, "q", unsigned long long, "=r", :"memory")
> +build_mmio_read(__readq, "q", unsigned long long, "=r", )
> +build_mmio_write(writeq, "q", unsigned long long, "r", :"memory")
> +build_mmio_write(__writeq, "q", unsigned long long, "r", )

What's wrong with u64 which we use for expressing io access to a 64bit wide
resource?

Thanks,

	tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ