linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] mailbox: ACPI: Remove incorrect error message about parsing PCCT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <190779407.lJoETU6Q66@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date:   Sun, 13 May 2018 10:30:05 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Al Stone <ahs3@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] mailbox: ACPI: Remove incorrect error message about parsing PCCT

On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 2:39:04 AM CEST Al Stone wrote:
> This set of patches provide some cleanup in ACPI for minor issues
> found while correcting a bogus error message (the first two patches),
> and the correction for the error message itself (patch 3/3).  Note
> that patches 1/3 and 2/3 are not required for 3/3 to work: 1/3 only
> changes a comment and 2/3 makes an ACPI table parsing loop a wee bit
> more robust.
> 
> For patch 3/3, many systems on boot have been reporting "Error parsing
> PCC subspaces from PCCT" which turns out to not be an error at all.
> The issue is that the probe for ACPI mailboxes defined in the PCCT
> (Platform Communications Channel Table) makes a faulty assumption about
> the content of the PCCT.  What's more, when the error is reported, no
> further PCC mailboxes are set up, even when they have been defined
> in the PCCT.  So, in the reported cases, there was no error and the
> data in the PCCT was being ignored.  This is described in more detail
> in patch 3/3.
> 
> Since these patches primarily involve ACPI usages, it may make
> sense for all of them to go through the linux-acpi tree; clearly,
> this is up to the maintainers, though.
> 
> v3:
>   -- properly format docbook info in patch 1/3
>   -- remove extra parens in patch 2/3
>   -- clean up formatting, remove pr_warn() calls used in debugging but
>      providing no value, clean up docbook info for count_pcc_subspaces()
>      and parse_pcc_subspaces(), all in patch 3/3
> 
> v2:
>   -- removed one extraneous '+' in a comment in patch 3/3
>   -- fixed an if test that had a predicate that kbuild pointed out would
>      always be zero
> 
> Al Stone (3):
>   ACPI: improve function documentation for acpi_parse_entries_array()
>   ACPI: ensure acpi_parse_entries_array() does not access non-existent
>     table data
>   mailbox: ACPI: erroneous error message when parsing the ACPI PCCT
> 
>  drivers/acpi/tables.c | 12 ++++---
>  drivers/mailbox/pcc.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

I've applied [1-2/3] and I'm waiting on input from Prashanth on the [3/3].

Thanks,
Rafael