[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201805131947.IJC65168.OOFOMFJHLVQStF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2018 19:47:05 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: dvyukov@...gle.com
Cc: syzbot+3417712847e7219a60ee@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, pombredanne@...b.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in corrupted
Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 12:20 PM, Tetsuo Handa
> <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> > Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >> This looks very similar to "KASAN: use-after-free Read in fuse_kill_sb_blk":
> >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/syzkaller-bugs/4C4oiBX8vZ0/0NTQRcUYBgAJ
> >>
> >> which you fixed with "fuse: don't keep dead fuse_conn at fuse_fill_super().":
> >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/syzkaller-bugs/4C4oiBX8vZ0/W6pi8NdbBgAJ
> >>
> >> However, here we have use-after-free in fuse_kill_sb_anon instead of
> >> use_kill_sb_blk. Do you think your patch will fix this as well?
> >
> > Yes, for fuse_kill_sb_anon() and fuse_kill_sb_blk() are symmetrical.
> > I'm waiting for Miklos Szeredi to apply that patch.
>
>
> Thanks for confirming. Let's do:
>
> #syz fix: fuse: don't keep dead fuse_conn at fuse_fill_super().
>
Excuse me, but that patch is not yet applied to any git tree. Isn't the rule that
If you forgot to add the Reported-by tag, once the fix for this bug is merged into any tree, please reply to this email with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title
? That's the reason I keep
KASAN: use-after-free Read in fuse_kill_sb_blk
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=a07a680ed0a9290585ca424546860464dd9658db
report "open()" table but I want keyword column available in the "open()" table
so that we can announce that "patch is proposed and waiting for review" state.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists