linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 2/8] rcu: Clarify usage of cond

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 May 2018 10:54:54 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, byungchul.park@....com,
        kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/8] rcu: Clarify usage of cond_resched for
 tasks-RCU

On Sun, 13 May 2018 20:15:35 -0700
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:

> Recently we had a discussion about cond_resched unconditionally
> recording a voluntary context switch [1].
> 
> Lets add a comment clarifying that how this API is to be used.
> 
> [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1526027434-21237-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/rcupdate.h | 11 ++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index 743226176350..a9881007ece6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -159,8 +159,12 @@ static inline void rcu_init_nohz(void) { }
>  	} while (0)
>  
>  /*
> - * Note a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks benefit.  This is a
> - * macro rather than an inline function to avoid #include hell.
> + * Note an attempt to perform a voluntary context switch for RCU-tasks benefit.
> + *
> + * This is called even in situations where a context switch didn't really
> + * happen even though it was requested. The caller uses it to indicate
> + * traversal of an RCU-tasks quiescent state. This is a macro rather than an
> + * inline function to avoid #include hell.

I don't know. I just don't like the wording. It sounds too much like
it was written by someone that was confused for it being called when a
context switch didn't occur ;-)

What about something more like:

/*
 * This is called to denote a RCU-task quiescent state. It is placed at
 * voluntary preemption points, as RCU-task critical sections may not
 * perform voluntary preemption or scheduling calls. It does not matter
 * if the task is scheduled out or not, just that a voluntary preemption
 * may be done.
 */

>   */
>  #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
>  #define rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch_lite(t) \
> @@ -187,7 +191,8 @@ static inline void exit_tasks_rcu_finish(void) { }
>  #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU */
>  
>  /**
> - * cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs - Report potential quiescent states to RCU
> + * cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs - Report potential quiescent states to RCU.
> + * The quiescent state report is made even if cond_resched() did nothing.

Same thing here.

 * The quiescent state report does not depend on cond_resched() scheduling.

-- Steve


>   *
>   * This macro resembles cond_resched(), except that it is defined to
>   * report potential quiescent states to RCU-tasks even if the cond_resched()