[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a7355b4-7bf1-c911-e010-263e3380794a@themaw.net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 13:49:00 +0800
From: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
autofs mailing list <autofs@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] autofs4 - merge auto_fs.h and auto_fs4.h
On 14/05/18 11:15, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:03:50AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
>> The autofs module has long since been removed so there's no need to have
>> two separate include files for autofs.
>
> Umm... Why does fs/compat_ioctl.c need either include, actually?
>
>> --- a/fs/compat_ioctl.c
>> +++ b/fs/compat_ioctl.c
>> @@ -39,7 +39,6 @@
>> #include <linux/if_pppox.h>
>> #include <linux/mtio.h>
>> #include <linux/auto_fs.h>
>> -#include <linux/auto_fs4.h>
>> #include <linux/tty.h>
>> #include <linux/vt_kern.h>
>> #include <linux/fb.h>
>
> AFAICS, we can just delete both. Matter of fact, a *lot* of those includes are
> pointless nowadays...
>
OK, I'll have a look at that and post a follow up patch.
Thanks for having a look at these Al.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists