[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5e45f38e-cb45-d4a1-f351-30543f787290@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 15:00:50 -0500
From: Gary R Hook <gary.hook@....com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: joro@...tes.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] iommu/amd: Add basic debugfs infrastructure for
AMD IOMMU
On 05/14/2018 12:50 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/14/2018 10:20 AM, Gary R Hook wrote:
>> Implement a skeleton framework for debugfs support in the
>> AMD IOMMU.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gary R Hook <gary.hook@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/Makefile | 5 +++++
>> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_debugfs.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_init.c | 6 ++++--
>> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_proto.h | 6 ++++++
>> drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_types.h | 3 +++
>> 5 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_debugfs.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Makefile b/drivers/iommu/Makefile
>> index 74cfbc392862..dd980f7dd8b6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/Makefile
>> @@ -30,3 +30,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_IOMMU) += exynos-iommu.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_PAMU) += fsl_pamu.o fsl_pamu_domain.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_S390_IOMMU) += s390-iommu.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_IOMMU) += qcom_iommu.o
>> +
>> +# This ensures that only the required files are compiled
>> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_IOMMU_DEBUGFS), y)
>
> Most Makefiles don't use a space before the 'y', but since you tested it,
> I guess either way works.
Pretty sure whitespace isn't used as a delimiter in this construct. I
could be mistaken. But yes, it's perfectly serviceable.
> But why do this in the Makefile at all? Why not just add another Kconfig
> symbol and simplify the Makefile?
>
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU) += amd_iommu_debugfs.o
>> +endif
This was brought up a few weeks ago in, I believe, version 3 of this
patch. That question was discussed (because that's what I did the first
time out), and _someone_ _else_ asked about why I didn't just do it the
way I've done it here.
Everyone has a preference.
I chose to simplify the choices and avoid multiple symbols, instead
opting for two switches: choose your device, and decide on Debug FS
enablement for it. IMO Very simple.
I can't fathom a scenario where this wouldn't work. Is there one?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists