lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180514064756.523645687@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 14 May 2018 08:48:20 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, DaeRyong Jeong <threeearcat@...il.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 15/56] ALSA: aloop: Add missing cable lock to ctl API callbacks

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>

commit 76b3421b39bd610546931fc923edcf90c18fa395 upstream.

Some control API callbacks in aloop driver are too lazy to take the
loopback->cable_lock and it results in possible races of cable access
while it's being freed.  It eventually lead to a UAF, as reported by
fuzzer recently.

This patch covers such control API callbacks and add the proper mutex
locks.

Reported-by: DaeRyong Jeong <threeearcat@...il.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 sound/drivers/aloop.c |   17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/sound/drivers/aloop.c
+++ b/sound/drivers/aloop.c
@@ -832,9 +832,11 @@ static int loopback_rate_shift_get(struc
 {
 	struct loopback *loopback = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
 	
+	mutex_lock(&loopback->cable_lock);
 	ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] =
 		loopback->setup[kcontrol->id.subdevice]
 			       [kcontrol->id.device].rate_shift;
+	mutex_unlock(&loopback->cable_lock);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -866,9 +868,11 @@ static int loopback_notify_get(struct sn
 {
 	struct loopback *loopback = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
 	
+	mutex_lock(&loopback->cable_lock);
 	ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] =
 		loopback->setup[kcontrol->id.subdevice]
 			       [kcontrol->id.device].notify;
+	mutex_unlock(&loopback->cable_lock);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -880,12 +884,14 @@ static int loopback_notify_put(struct sn
 	int change = 0;
 
 	val = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] ? 1 : 0;
+	mutex_lock(&loopback->cable_lock);
 	if (val != loopback->setup[kcontrol->id.subdevice]
 				[kcontrol->id.device].notify) {
 		loopback->setup[kcontrol->id.subdevice]
 			[kcontrol->id.device].notify = val;
 		change = 1;
 	}
+	mutex_unlock(&loopback->cable_lock);
 	return change;
 }
 
@@ -893,15 +899,18 @@ static int loopback_active_get(struct sn
 			       struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
 {
 	struct loopback *loopback = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
-	struct loopback_cable *cable = loopback->cables
-			[kcontrol->id.subdevice][kcontrol->id.device ^ 1];
+	struct loopback_cable *cable;
+
 	unsigned int val = 0;
 
+	mutex_lock(&loopback->cable_lock);
+	cable = loopback->cables[kcontrol->id.subdevice][kcontrol->id.device ^ 1];
 	if (cable != NULL) {
 		unsigned int running = cable->running ^ cable->pause;
 
 		val = (running & (1 << SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK)) ? 1 : 0;
 	}
+	mutex_unlock(&loopback->cable_lock);
 	ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = val;
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -944,9 +953,11 @@ static int loopback_rate_get(struct snd_
 {
 	struct loopback *loopback = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
 	
+	mutex_lock(&loopback->cable_lock);
 	ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] =
 		loopback->setup[kcontrol->id.subdevice]
 			       [kcontrol->id.device].rate;
+	mutex_unlock(&loopback->cable_lock);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -966,9 +977,11 @@ static int loopback_channels_get(struct
 {
 	struct loopback *loopback = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
 	
+	mutex_lock(&loopback->cable_lock);
 	ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] =
 		loopback->setup[kcontrol->id.subdevice]
 			       [kcontrol->id.device].channels;
+	mutex_unlock(&loopback->cable_lock);
 	return 0;
 }
 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ