[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180514064804.832924487@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 08:48:41 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 07/36] net: initialize skb->peeked when cloning
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
commit b13dda9f9aa7caceeee61c080c2e544d5f5d85e5 upstream.
syzbot reported __skb_try_recv_from_queue() was using skb->peeked
while it was potentially unitialized.
We need to clear it in __skb_clone()
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/core/skbuff.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -903,6 +903,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *__skb_clone(struc
n->hdr_len = skb->nohdr ? skb_headroom(skb) : skb->hdr_len;
n->cloned = 1;
n->nohdr = 0;
+ n->peeked = 0;
n->destructor = NULL;
C(tail);
C(end);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists