[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180514064758.800723206@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 08:48:48 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Yi Zhao <yi.zhao@...driver.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Nathan Harold <nharold@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 43/56] xfrm_user: fix return value from xfrm_user_rcv_msg
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Yi Zhao <yi.zhao@...driver.com>
commit 83e2d0587ae859aae75fd9d246c409b10a6bd137 upstream.
It doesn't support to run 32bit 'ip' to set xfrm objdect on 64bit host.
But the return value is unknown for user program:
ip xfrm policy list
RTNETLINK answers: Unknown error 524
Replace ENOTSUPP with EOPNOTSUPP:
ip xfrm policy list
RTNETLINK answers: Operation not supported
Signed-off-by: Yi Zhao <yi.zhao@...driver.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Harold <nharold@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -2480,7 +2480,7 @@ static int xfrm_user_rcv_msg(struct sk_b
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
if (is_compat_task())
- return -ENOTSUPP;
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
#endif
type = nlh->nlmsg_type;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists