lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-1de3a1be8a9345fd0c7d9bb1009b21afe6b6b10f@git.kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 14 May 2018 00:50:23 -0700
From:   tip-bot for Hans de Goede <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     matt@...eblueprint.co.uk, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        hdegoede@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org
Subject: [tip:efi/core] efi/x86: Ignore unrealistically large option ROMs

Commit-ID:  1de3a1be8a9345fd0c7d9bb1009b21afe6b6b10f
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/1de3a1be8a9345fd0c7d9bb1009b21afe6b6b10f
Author:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 4 May 2018 08:00:01 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 14 May 2018 08:57:49 +0200

efi/x86: Ignore unrealistically large option ROMs

setup_efi_pci() tries to save a copy of each PCI option ROM as this may
be necessary for the device driver for the PCI device to have access too.

On some systems the efi_pci_io_protocol's romimage and romsize fields
contain invalid data, which looks a bit like pointers pointing back into
other EFI code or data. Interpreting these pointers as romsize leads to
a very large value and if we then try to alloc this amount of memory to
save a copy the alloc call fails.

This leads to a "Failed to alloc mem for rom" error being printed on the
EFI console for each PCI device.

This commit avoids the printing of these errors, by checking romsize before
doing the alloc and if it is larger then the EFI spec limit of 16 MiB
silently ignore the ROM fields instead of trying to alloc mem and fail.

Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
[ardb: deduplicate 32/64 bit changes, use SZ_16M symbolic constant]
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180504060003.19618-16-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
index dadf32312082..a8a8642d2b0b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/eboot.c
@@ -123,10 +123,17 @@ __setup_efi_pci(efi_pci_io_protocol_t *pci, struct pci_setup_rom **__rom)
 	if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
 		return status;
 
+	/*
+	 * Some firmware images contain EFI function pointers at the place where the
+	 * romimage and romsize fields are supposed to be. Typically the EFI
+	 * code is mapped at high addresses, translating to an unrealistically
+	 * large romsize. The UEFI spec limits the size of option ROMs to 16
+	 * MiB so we reject any ROMs over 16 MiB in size to catch this.
+	 */
 	romimage = (void *)(unsigned long)efi_table_attr(efi_pci_io_protocol,
 							 romimage, pci);
 	romsize = efi_table_attr(efi_pci_io_protocol, romsize, pci);
-	if (!romimage || !romsize)
+	if (!romimage || !romsize || romsize > SZ_16M)
 		return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
 
 	size = romsize + sizeof(*rom);

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ