[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c485c97-f667-7cbd-a6a0-bc74d8aa0918@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 11:18:12 +0200
From: Bastian Stender <bst@...gutronix.de>
To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"viresh.kumar@...aro.org" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"rui.zhang@...el.com" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"edubezval@...il.com" <edubezval@...il.com>
Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] thermal: imx: remove cpufreq cooling registration
On 05/14/2018 11:10 AM, Anson Huang wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bastian Stender [mailto:bst@...gutronix.de]
>> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 4:37 PM
>> To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>; shawnguo@...nel.org;
>> s.hauer@...gutronix.de; kernel@...gutronix.de; Fabio Estevam
>> <fabio.estevam@....com>; robh+dt@...nel.org; mark.rutland@....com;
>> rjw@...ysocki.net; viresh.kumar@...aro.org; rui.zhang@...el.com;
>> edubezval@...il.com
>> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-pm@...r.kernel.org; dl-linux-imx
>> <linux-imx@....com>; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
>> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] thermal: imx: remove cpufreq cooling registration
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 05/14/2018 10:09 AM, Anson Huang wrote:
>>> This patch removes cpufreq cooling registration in thermal .probe
>>> function, cpufreq cooling should be done in cpufreq driver when it is
>>> ready.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
>>
>> It seems you are trying to achieve something similar to a patch I sent a couple
>> of month ago. Unfortunately I did not have the time to rework it yet:
>>
>>
>> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpatch
>> work.kernel.org%2Fpatch%2F10059085%2F&data=02%7C01%7Canson.huang
>> %40nxp.com%7C179da3635cab4a14deef08d5b975ecb6%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6f
>> a92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636618838508978629&sdata=BcQ9tc%2BE
>> CZ%2Fk4AsZFxshgmvSsPg7eRN0ASzP8LO8yBI%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> Some of the comments might apply here too.
>
> Ah, I did NOT notice this thread, so how to proceed, will you
> continue to finish your patch? If yes, then you can just ignore/skip
> my patch, thanks.
Yes, I will revisit the patch in a couple of weeks. It would be nice to
get your feedback then.
Regards,
Bastian
--
Pengutronix e.K.
Industrial Linux Solutions
http://www.pengutronix.de/
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
Powered by blists - more mailing lists