linux-kernel - Re: [bisected] 051f3ca02e46 "Introduce NUMA identity node sched domain" breaks fake NUMA on s390

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180514093909.GO12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 14 May 2018 11:39:09 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc:     Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andre Wild <wild@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bisected] 051f3ca02e46 "Introduce NUMA identity node sched
 domain" breaks fake NUMA on s390

On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 12:02:33PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Andre Wild reported that fake NUMA doesn't work on s390 anymore. Doesn't
> work means it crashed for Andre, or it is in an endless loop within
> init_sched_groups_capacity() for me (sg != sd->groups is always true).
> 
> I could reproduce this with a very simple setup with only two nodes, where
> each node has only one CPU. This allowed me to bisect it down to commit
> 051f3ca02e46 ("sched/topology: Introduce NUMA identity node sched domain").
> 
> With that commit reverted the system comes up again and the scheduling
> domains look like this:
> 
> [    0.148592] smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...
> [    0.148984] smp: Brought up 2 nodes, 2 CPUs
> [    0.149097] CPU0 attaching sched-domain(s):
> [    0.149099]  domain-0: span=0-1 level=NUMA
> [    0.149101]   groups: 0:{ span=0 }, 1:{ span=1 }
> [    0.149106] CPU1 attaching sched-domain(s):
> [    0.149107]  domain-0: span=0-1 level=NUMA
> [    0.149108]   groups: 1:{ span=1 }, 0:{ span=0 }
> [    0.149111] span: 0-1 (max cpu_capacity = 1024)
> 
> Any idea what's going wrong?

Not yet; still trying to decipher your fake nume implementation.

But meanwhile; could you provide me with:

$ cat /sys/devices/system/node/node*/distance
$ cat /sys/devices/system/node/node*/cpulist