[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180514102520epcms1p86d14eee975eb6b048580c6390e673367@epcms1p8>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 19:25:20 +0900
From: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
To: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"heiko@...ech.de" <heiko@...ech.de>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"dbasehore@...omium.org" <dbasehore@...omium.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dianders@...gle.com" <dianders@...gle.com>,
"groeck@...omium.org" <groeck@...omium.org>,
"kernel@...labora.com" <kernel@...labora.com>,
"hl@...k-chips.com" <hl@...k-chips.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 3/6] devfreq: rk3399_dmc: remove wait for dcf irq
event.
>We have already wait dcf done in ATF, so don't need wait dcf irq
>in kernel, besides, clear dcf irq in kernel will import competiton
>between kernel and ATF, only handle dcf irq in ATF is a better way.
>
>Signed-off-by: Lin Huang <hl@...k-chips.com>
>Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>
>Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
>---
>
>Changes in v4: None
>Changes in v3: None
>Changes in v2:
>- [3/6] Add Reviewed-by Chanwoo Choi
>
> drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c | 53 +-----------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists