[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4fe632fec126388ef14412ea35cca2525f2449c5.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 14:11:48 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] rcu: Use pr_fmt to prefix "rcu: " to logging
output
On Tue, 2018-05-15 at 12:28 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 05:32:05PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 05:23:59PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 16:58 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > OK, so if I define pr_fmt as follows, I get the old behavior?
> > > >
> > > > #define pr_fmt(fmt) fmt
> > >
> > > yes.
> >
> > OK, then I will queue patches with this for the near term for
> > the various torture files.
>
> And here is the patch. Thoughts?
Seems sensible.
Perhaps still do the pr_alert->pr_cont conversions.
cheers, Joe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists