linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 1/8] x86: objtool: use asm macro for better compiler decisions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <4E72C06C-7A4B-4E18-83DA-8E0C9F701854@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 May 2018 14:53:52 -0700
From:   Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
To:     Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>,
        linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/8] x86: objtool: use asm macro for better compiler
 decisions

Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org> wrote:

> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 07:11:08AM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:
>> GCC considers the number of statements in inlined assembly blocks,
>> according to new-lines and semicolons, as an indication to the cost of
>> the block in time and space. This data is distorted by the kernel code,
>> which puts information in alternative sections. As a result, the
>> compiler may perform incorrect inlining and branch optimizations.
>> 
>> In the case of objtool, this distortion is extreme, since anyhow the
>> annotations of objtool are discarded during linkage.
>> 
>> The solution is to set an assembly macro and call it from the inlinedv
>> assembly block. As a result GCC considers the inline assembly block as
>> a single instruction.
>> 
>> This patch slightly increases the kernel size.
>> 
>>   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>> 18126699 10066728 2936832 31130259 1db0293 ./vmlinux before
>> 18126824 10067268 2936832 31130924 1db052c ./vmlinux after (+665)
> 
> With what kernel config? What's the text size change for an allnoconfig?

I use my custom config and to include the drivers in the image. Other
configs were not too appropriate: defconfig does not enable paravirt and
allyesconfig is too heavy.

There is no effect with allnoconfig on size:

   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
1018441	 230148	1215604	2464193	 2599c1	./vmlinux
1018441	 230148	1215604	2464193	 2599c1	./vmlinux

I think it is expected since CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION is off. No?

Thanks,
Nadav