[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180515004152.GB209519@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 17:41:52 -0700
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, byungchul.park@....com,
kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/8] rcu: Get rid of old c variable from places in
tree RCU
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:57:39AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 08:15:37PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > The 'c' variable was used previously to store the grace period
> > that is being requested. However it is not very meaningful for
> > a code reader, this patch replaces it with gp_seq_start indicating that
>
> Good catch, but how about "gp_seq_req" instead of gp_seq_start?
Yes, that works as well and is also 2 character less. Will change it.
thanks,
- Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists