[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxgDFb1jgKBx9p=DVXqBpx_Jiw_zDggf5PPN+=qhv-xTsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 10:04:20 +0300
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] locking/percpu-rwsem: Mark rwsem as
non-spinnable in percpu_rwsem_release()
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 8:42 AM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:31 PM, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
>> The percpu_rwsem_release() is called when the ownership of the embedded
>> rwsem is to be transferred to another task. The new owner, however, may
>> take a while to get the ownership of the lock via percpu_rwsem_acquire().
>> During that period, the rwsem is now marked as writer-owned with no
>> optimistic spinning.
>>
>
> Waiman,
>
> Thanks for the fix. I will test it soon.
>
> For this commit message I suggest that you add parts of the reproducer
> found here:
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=152622016219975&w=2
>
fsfreeze is happy with these changes.
You may add:
Tested-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Thanks,
Amir.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists