linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/bridge: sii902x: add optional power supplies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2814752.ZM2IG9T3fV@avalon>
Date:   Tue, 15 May 2018 10:36:30 +0300
From:   Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To:     Philippe CORNU <philippe.cornu@...com>
Cc:     Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yannick FERTRE <yannick.fertre@...com>,
        Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
        Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/bridge: sii902x: add optional power supplies

Hi Philippe,

On Monday, 14 May 2018 21:58:48 EEST Philippe CORNU wrote:
> On 05/14/2018 12:33 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> > On 14.05.2018 11:38, Philippe CORNU wrote:
> >> On 04/25/2018 09:53 AM, Philippe Cornu wrote:
> >>> Add the optional power supplies using the description found in
> >>> "SiI9022A/SiI9024A HDMI Transmitter Data Sheet (August 2016)".
> >>>
> >>> The sii902x input IOs are not "io safe" so it is important to
> >>> enable/disable voltage regulators during probe/remove phases to
> >>> avoid damages.
> > 
> > What exactly does it mean? Ie I understand that the chip has some
> > limitations, but why enabling/disabling regulators in probe/remove
> > should solve it?
> 
> thank you for your comment.
> 
> And sorry for the "bad" explanation in the 2nd paragraph about the fact 
> that inputs are not "io safe". I added this 2nd paragraph in v2 
> following a good comment from Laurent on adding the management of the 
> regulators outside the probe/remove for a better power consumption 
> management (enable/disable regulators only when the ic is used for 
> displaying something for instance...). But after a deeper analysis, I 
> realized that the only way to improve the power consumption is to 
> implement & test the sii902x various sleep modes, that is out-of-scope 
> of this small patch and also out-of-scope of my test board I use on 
> which the sii902x bridge ic power consumption is very low compare to the 
> rest of the system...
> 
> I will remove this "explanation" in v3 as it creates confusion.

I'd rather keep it and expand it explain why enabling/disabling regulators at 
probe/remove solves the problem. Your patch otherwise looks OK (although if 
you submit a v3 anyway you could also rename err_disable_regulator to 
err_disable_regulators).

> >>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu@...com>
> >>> ---
> >>> 
> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/sii902x.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart