lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 15 May 2018 13:27:47 +0530
From:   Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>
To:     Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: Fix deadlock in shutdown ioctl

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:39:42AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2018/5/10 21:20, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> > f2fs_ioc_shutdown() ioctl gets stuck in the below path
> > when going down with full sync (F2FS_GOING_DOWN_FULLSYNC)
> > option.
> > 
> > __switch_to+0x90/0xc4
> > percpu_down_write+0x8c/0xc0
> > freeze_super+0xec/0x1e4
> > freeze_bdev+0xc4/0xcc
> > f2fs_ioctl+0xc0c/0x1ce0
> > f2fs_compat_ioctl+0x98/0x1f0
> > 
> > Fix this by not holding write access during this ioctl.
> 
> I think we can just remove lock coverage for F2FS_GOING_DOWN_FULLSYNC path, for
> other path, we need to keep as it is.
>

Thanks, I thought about it too but then I checked that XFS shutdown ioctl is
not taking any lock for this ioctl. Hence, I followed the same in F2FS.
Do you know why XFS is not taking any lock? Is it really needed in shutdown
ioctl?

--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ