linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] drivers core: multi-threading device shutdown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGM2reYnZ6q-2XCJ+7=6g+8OPvujCwnhXX7BMQbOLemSTpJY+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 May 2018 08:21:03 -0400
From:   Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
To:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>,
        Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>, tobin@...orbit.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] drivers core: multi-threading device shutdown

Hi Greg,

> Can you refactor this to be at least 2 patches?  One that moves code
> around to comon functions to make the second patch, that adds the new
> functionality, easier to review and understand?

Yes, I will split the patch into a two-three patches.


> And I echo the "don't use kerneldoc for static functions" review
> comment, that's not needed at all.

It was my mistake, I did not realize they were kerneldoc, I simply tried to
follow the code style of this file :) I will modify comments not to be
kerneldoc.

Thank you,
Pavel