[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180515140326.GC31296@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 16:03:26 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: simplify procfs code for seq_file instances V2
On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 08:19:49PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 05:47:47PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Changes since V1:
> > - open code proc_create_data to avoid setting not fully initialized
> > entries live
> > - use unsigned int for state_size
>
> Need this to maintain sizeof(struct proc_dir_entry):
I'll fold your changes into the relevant patches.
> Otherwise ACK fs/proc/ part.
I'll take this as a formal ACK-ed by for all patches touching
procfs. If I was wrong please scream.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists