[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180515180710.GQ12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 20:07:10 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] locking/percpu-rwsem: Annotate rwsem ownership
transfer by setting RWSEM_OWNER_UNKNOWN
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:02:19AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 07:58:05PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 01:38:04PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> > > +/*
> > > + * Owner value to indicate the rwsem's owner is not currently known.
> > > + */
> > > +#define RWSEM_OWNER_UNKNOWN ((struct task_struct *)-1)
> >
> > It might be nice to comment that this works and relies on having that
> > ANON_OWNER bit set.
>
> I'd rather change the definition to be ((struct task_struct *)2)
> otherwise this is both reader-owned and anonymously-owned which doesn't
> make much sense.
Works for me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists