[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <vbf8t8k0vu2.fsf@reg-r-vrt-018-180.mtr.labs.mlnx>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 12:54:29 +0300
From: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, jhs@...atatu.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, pablo@...filter.org,
kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, fw@...len.de, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, edumazet@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, kliteyn@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] net: sched: use unique idr insert function in unlocked actions
On Wed 16 May 2018 at 09:50, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> Mon, May 14, 2018 at 04:27:14PM CEST, vladbu@...lanox.com wrote:
>>Substitute calls to action insert function with calls to action insert
>>unique function that warns if insertion overwrites index in idr.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
>>---
>> net/sched/act_bpf.c | 2 +-
>> net/sched/act_connmark.c | 2 +-
>> net/sched/act_csum.c | 2 +-
>> net/sched/act_gact.c | 2 +-
>> net/sched/act_ife.c | 2 +-
>> net/sched/act_ipt.c | 2 +-
>> net/sched/act_mirred.c | 2 +-
>> net/sched/act_nat.c | 2 +-
>> net/sched/act_pedit.c | 2 +-
>> net/sched/act_police.c | 2 +-
>> net/sched/act_sample.c | 2 +-
>> net/sched/act_simple.c | 2 +-
>> net/sched/act_skbedit.c | 2 +-
>> net/sched/act_skbmod.c | 2 +-
>> net/sched/act_tunnel_key.c | 2 +-
>> net/sched/act_vlan.c | 2 +-
>> 16 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/net/sched/act_bpf.c b/net/sched/act_bpf.c
>>index 7e20fdc..0bf4ecf 100644
>>--- a/net/sched/act_bpf.c
>>+++ b/net/sched/act_bpf.c
>>@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ static int tcf_bpf_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
>> rcu_assign_pointer(prog->filter, cfg.filter);
>>
>> if (res == ACT_P_CREATED) {
>>- tcf_idr_insert(tn, *act);
>>+ tcf_idr_insert_unique(tn, *act);
>
> Seems to me that tcf_idr_insert() is unused after this patch. If that is
> the case, I think that you don't need to introduce
> tcf_idr_insert_unique() and just do what you need to do in
> tcf_idr_insert()
Got it.
>
> [...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists