[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180516101151.GK1972@nanopsycho>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 12:11:51 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, jhs@...atatu.com,
xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, pablo@...filter.org,
kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, fw@...len.de, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, edumazet@...gle.com, keescook@...omium.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, kliteyn@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] net: core: add new/replace rate estimator lock
parameter
Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:00:57PM CEST, vladbu@...lanox.com wrote:
>
>On Wed 16 May 2018 at 09:54, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
>> Mon, May 14, 2018 at 04:27:12PM CEST, vladbu@...lanox.com wrote:
>>>Extend rate estimator new and replace APIs with additional spinlock
>>>parameter used by lockless actions to protect rate_est pointer from
>>>concurrent modification.
>>>
>>>Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>
>>> /**
>>> * gen_new_estimator - create a new rate estimator
>>> * @bstats: basic statistics
>>> * @cpu_bstats: bstats per cpu
>>> * @rate_est: rate estimator statistics
>>>+ * @rate_est_lock: rate_est lock (might be NULL)
>>
>> I cannot find a place you actually use this new arg in this patchset.
>> Did I miss it?
>
>It is used by specific action init function. However, that code was
>moved to next patchset due to patchset size limit.
Please move this patch too.
>
>>
>>
>>> * @stats_lock: statistics lock
>>> * @running: qdisc running seqcount
>>> * @opt: rate estimator configuration TLV
>>
>> [...]
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists