[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180516104313.GC12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 12:43:13 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 03/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Utility functions
to boost HWP performance limits
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:15:09AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> So if the "cached" thing is the last "not boosted EPP", that's why it
> is not updated here.
Sure, I see what it does, just saying that naming and comments are wrong
vs the actual code.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists