linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/8] Improving compiler inlining decisions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <03B86732-8D0B-40A7-B09C-5823104E631F@vmware.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 May 2018 04:30:19 +0000
From:   Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
CC:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
        Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] Improving compiler inlining decisions

Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 07:11:07AM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:
>> This patch-set deals with an interesting yet stupid problem: code that
>> does not get inlined despite its simplicity.
> 
> I got the 0/8 patch twice, and didn't get the 1/8 patch.  Was there an
> issue with the sending of the patches?

Strange. I am not sure why it happened. Anyhow 1/8 is available here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/15/961 . I will forward it to you.

Thanks,
Nadav