linux-kernel - [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 04/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add update_util

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180516044911.28797-5-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 May 2018 21:49:05 -0700
From:   Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To:     srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, bp@...e.de,
        lenb@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, mgorman@...hsingularity.net
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
        juri.lelli@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 04/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Add update_util_hook for HWP

When HWP dynamic boost is active then set the HWP specific update util
hook. Also start and stop processing in frequency invariant accounting
based on the HWP dyanmic boost setting

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index dc7dfa9..e200887 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ static struct pstate_funcs pstate_funcs __read_mostly;
 
 static int hwp_active __read_mostly;
 static bool per_cpu_limits __read_mostly;
+static bool hwp_boost __read_mostly;
 
 static struct cpufreq_driver *intel_pstate_driver __read_mostly;
 
@@ -1420,6 +1421,12 @@ static void csd_init(struct cpudata *cpu)
 	cpu->csd.info = cpu;
 }
 
+static inline void intel_pstate_update_util_hwp(struct update_util_data *data,
+						u64 time, unsigned int flags)
+{
+
+}
+
 static inline void intel_pstate_calc_avg_perf(struct cpudata *cpu)
 {
 	struct sample *sample = &cpu->sample;
@@ -1723,7 +1730,7 @@ static void intel_pstate_set_update_util_hook(unsigned int cpu_num)
 {
 	struct cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[cpu_num];
 
-	if (hwp_active)
+	if (hwp_active && !hwp_boost)
 		return;
 
 	if (cpu->update_util_set)
@@ -1731,8 +1738,12 @@ static void intel_pstate_set_update_util_hook(unsigned int cpu_num)
 
 	/* Prevent intel_pstate_update_util() from using stale data. */
 	cpu->sample.time = 0;
-	cpufreq_add_update_util_hook(cpu_num, &cpu->update_util,
-				     intel_pstate_update_util);
+	if (hwp_active)
+		cpufreq_add_update_util_hook(cpu_num, &cpu->update_util,
+					     intel_pstate_update_util_hwp);
+	else
+		cpufreq_add_update_util_hook(cpu_num, &cpu->update_util,
+					     intel_pstate_update_util);
 	cpu->update_util_set = true;
 }
 
@@ -1844,8 +1855,15 @@ static int intel_pstate_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 		intel_pstate_set_update_util_hook(policy->cpu);
 	}
 
-	if (hwp_active)
+	if (hwp_active) {
+		if (hwp_boost) {
+			x86_arch_scale_freq_tick_enable();
+		} else {
+			intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook(policy->cpu);
+			x86_arch_scale_freq_tick_disable();
+		}
 		intel_pstate_hwp_set(policy->cpu);
+	}
 
 	mutex_unlock(&intel_pstate_limits_lock);
 
-- 
2.9.5