[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180516131304.GF20670@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 06:13:04 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...ts.orangefs.org,
ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/14] vgem: separate errno from VM_FAULT_* values
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 03:01:59PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:53:03AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
> >
> > Want me to merge this through drm-misc or plan to pick it up yourself?
>
> For now I just want a honest discussion if people really actually
> want the vm_fault_t change with the whole picture in place.
That discussion already happened on the -mm mailing list. And again
at LSFMM. Both times the answer was yes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists