linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v4 4/5] virtio_ring: add event idx support in packed ring

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cfaa4e06-1f00-fd6c-5b4c-60eaafa63445@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 May 2018 21:31:23 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@...el.com>
Cc:     mst@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        wexu@...hat.com, jfreimann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 4/5] virtio_ring: add event idx support in packed ring



On 2018年05月16日 20:58, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 08:17:21PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On 2018年05月16日 16:37, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> [...]
>>> @@ -1160,15 +1186,27 @@ static void virtqueue_disable_cb_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
>>>    static unsigned virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare_packed(struct virtqueue *_vq)
>>>    {
>>>    	struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
>>> +	u16 wrap_counter;
>>>    	START_USE(vq);
>>>    	/* We optimistically turn back on interrupts, then check if there was
>>>    	 * more to do. */
>>> +	/* Depending on the VIRTIO_RING_F_USED_EVENT_IDX feature, we need to
>>> +	 * either clear the flags bit or point the event index at the next
>>> +	 * entry. Always update the event index to keep code simple. */
>>> +
>>> +	wrap_counter = vq->wrap_counter;
>>> +	if (vq->last_used_idx > vq->next_avail_idx)
>> Should this be ">=" consider rx refill may try to completely fill the ring?
> It seems that there are two cases that last_used_idx
> equals to next_avail_idx. The first one is that the
> ring is empty. And the second one is that the ring
> is full. Although in the first case, most probably,
> the driver won't enable the interrupt.
>
> Maybe I really should track the used_wrap_counter
> instead of calculating it each time I need it.. I'll
> give it a try..
>

Right, good to know and this will match spec sample code.

Thanks