[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkda_nrL8HQL3y+tvHKff+5zKykd3Ym1waEm=JC1tFQbbcw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 16:31:10 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Discussions about the Letux Kernel
<letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org>, kernel@...a-handheld.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] pcal6524 extensions and fixes for pca953x driver
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 3:32 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com> wrote:
>> Am 16.05.2018 um 13:53 schrieb Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>:
>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 6:31 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com> wrote:
>>
>>> V5:
>>> * fix wrong split up between patches 1/7and 2/7.
>>
>> I applied patches 1, 2, 3 so we get some movement on the patch
>> set and not too much for you to rebase.
>
> thanks!
>
> Well, I already had edited the commit messages for resending...
>
>>
>> It's fine to just resend the rest next time.
>
> There is only one point open before resending:
>
> what is the preferred style to be used for PCAL_GPIO_MASK?
>
> * GENMASK(4, 0)
> * or 0x1f
No strong opinion... sorry. Whatever you & the other driver
contributors are most convenient with.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists